User
1.0
Image Quality Comparison — Standard Viewing Study 02Returned$6.00/hr
Grossly underpaying but will also screen out after completing 50 images if you don’t get enough correct
Institution · 2 researchers
Are you this researcher? Read how we handle your data and how to object.
Researchers: Redacted (6900cf969f5b55377c957ad0)
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 2 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
Grossly underpaying but will also screen out after completing 50 images if you don’t get enough correct