Rejected for an in-study screening instead of paying me for my time spent on the screener.
media.mit.edu - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 4 researchers
Êtes-vous ce chercheur ? Comment nous traitons vos données et comment vous opposer.
3.3
3 révisions1 rejet39 views
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 4 researchers at this institution.
Insights
$10.41/hrMedian hourly pay8 data points
89%Approval rate9 data points
34 minMedian actual time8 data points
Reported feedback
Clear instructions2Fast approval1Fair attention checks1In-study screening1
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Studies seen on Prolific8
- Week 1 - Improving Online Writing Tools
- Understanding the Effects of Revealing AI Assumption on Human-AI Interaction
- The MIT Circadian Rhythm Visualization Study Copy
- Week 4 - Improving Online Writing Tools
- Week 3 - Improving Online Writing Tools
- Week 2 - Improving Online Writing Tools
3 Avis
Researchers at this institution
3.3
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
Brandon Giesing
1.0
Anonymous follow-up 15-minute interview about hard-talk practice with AI Agents (audio only)Rejected
In Study Screening
jackjt8
5.0
Annotating Human-AI conversationsApproved$30.00/hr
Fast ApprovalClear InstructionsFair Attention Checks
Exactly as described and very straightforward. The task is super easy and the estimated time is way off... I actually spent most of my time doing other things running the time up...
jackjt8
4.0
screener for annotating conversation between human and AI chatbotApproved$9.47/hr
Clear Instructions
Took longer than stated but overall pretty straight forward study.