Prolific Tea has no ads and no investors. It runs on donations from participants like you. Chip in

media.mit.edu - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 4 researchers

Institution-wide rating
3 reviews1 rejection17 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 4 researchers at this institution.

Insights
$10.41/hrMedian hourly pay8 data points
89%Approval rate9 data points
34 minMedian actual time8 data points
Reported feedback
Clear instructions2Fast approval1Fair attention checks1In-study screening1

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific8
  • Week 1 - Improving Online Writing Tools
  • Understanding the Effects of Revealing AI Assumption on Human-AI Interaction
  • The MIT Circadian Rhythm Visualization Study Copy
  • Week 4 - Improving Online Writing Tools
  • Week 3 - Improving Online Writing Tools
  • Week 2 - Improving Online Writing Tools

Write a Review

You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.

3 Reviews

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

Brandon Giesing
Anonymous follow-up 15-minute interview about hard-talk practice with AI Agents (audio only)
Rejected
In Study Screening

Rejected for an in-study screening instead of paying me for my time spent on the screener.

jackjt8
Annotating Human-AI conversations
Approved$30.00/hr
Fast ApprovalClear InstructionsFair Attention Checks

Exactly as described and very straightforward. The task is super easy and the estimated time is way off... I actually spent most of my time doing other things running the time up...

jackjt8
screener for annotating conversation between human and AI chatbot
Approved$9.47/hr
Clear Instructions

Took longer than stated but overall pretty straight forward study.