O Prolific Tea não tem investidores. Ele funciona com doações de participantes como você. Apoiar agora

stu.xmu.edu.cn - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 2 researchers

Institution-wide rating
6 avaliações2 rejeições76 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 2 researchers at this institution.

Insights
50%Approval rate4 data points
Studies seen on Prolific4
  • Mind - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_B04 - Copy
  • Survey on decision making
  • Mind - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_A01
  • Prolific B- Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_02 - Copy

Escrever uma Revisão

Você precisa de uma conta para compartilhar sua experiência com este pesquisador.

6 Revisões

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

Dusty
Donation intention survey
Returned

Would not allow me to continue without sharing my location.

Jim
Donation intention survey
Returned

It was the only thing on my dashboard, otherwise I would not bother. It was for 10 cents for 2 minutes, so basically $2.38. I reported it to Prolific for going well under what they say the amount must be. Anyway when I did try it I got a message that I was not eligible for the study and to return it. SO that is what I did and I reported that too. They suck obviously. Interestingly after I looked again in my submissions, now it says 6 GPB per hour. They are full of it. Don't bother.

User
Anth - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_A04 - Copy
Approved

Instant approval.

User
Anth - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_A03 - Copy
Approved

Instant approval.

User
Mind - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_B03 - Copy - Copy
Rejected

Received an unfair rejection from this researcher. The task was to evaluate a virtual character. There were no wrong or right answers (multiple choice from 1 to 5) but my opinion about it was not received well with the following rejection message: Failed validity check. Gave extreme responses (strongly disagree) on sensory experience and mind perception of the virtual character.

Carrie
Mind - Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_B03 - Copy - Copy
Rejected

Unfair rejection. The study asks you to rate an AI character in advertising and then has prompts related to how much you like the character and the brand. My genuine response for a vast majority of the prompts was strongly disagree, as i strongly disagree that this character "makes decisions" or is "warm". I received a rejection with the following message in my inbox: "Failed validity check. Gave extreme responses (strongly disagree) on sensory experience and mind perception of the virtual character." Don't have strongly disagree as an option if I'm not allowed to strongly disagree. I have asked them to allow me to return the study and await their response. This is my first ever rejection.