O Prolific Tea não tem anúncios nem investidores. Ele funciona com doações de participantes como você. Apoiar agora
Institution · 18 researchers
Researchers: Redacted (657c5a1da64089ecd1b29470), Redacted (662d2bbc8875433aa51441f2), Redacted (682e7db34bc716f4cdc0cad2)
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 18 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Você precisa de uma conta para compartilhar sua experiência com este pesquisador.
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
I suppose I should have checked back on my other review, because yet again this study took me much longer than the intended time, and required a lot of thinking. It also didn't pay well. The study itself wasn't bad at least, aside from needing to think for a while.
Took much longer than the intended time, paid badly, and required a lot of reading and thinking.
Estimated completion time was listed 12 mins, but it took me 16 mins to complete. The instructions were long and winding, and I felt like I would get lost for a split second, but it was easy enough to understand fully. That aside, a lot of the attention checks relied on memory of what you previously read (and there was many) I would understand it if were comprehension checks, but from what I heard, attention checks relying on memory aren't exactly fair. There was also an in-study screening, but honestly.. I don't think such was for looking for the right demographics? I did a win a bonus of $1.50, that's a positive I will mention.