ProlificTea

AI Researcher - Prolific Researcher Reviews

2 Prolific accounts share this name

Combined across 2 accounts
7 avaliações507 views
Insights
$9.77/hrMedian hourly pay11 data points
100%Approval rate13 data points
27 minMedian actual time11 data points
Reported feedback
Fast approval5Underpays4Clear instructions2Confusing instructions1Fair attention checks1

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific6
  • Image-to-Video-Audio Generation Quality Evaluation
  • Image Diversity Ranking
  • Outpainting Image Quality Evaluation
  • Text-to-Image Quality Evaluation
  • Image-to-Video Generation Quality Evaluation
  • Image-Guided Generation Quality Evaluation

Escrever uma Revisão

Don't know the outcome yet? Enviar agora - quando a Prolific aprovar ou rejeitar sua envio (dias ou semanas depois), abra a lista de tarefas na barra superior para atualizar esta avaliação.

Não compartilhe detalhes de estudos marcados como confidenciais na Prolific.

7 Revisões

Accounts behind this page
Combined across 2 accounts

A blended rating across every account grouped under this page — not one person. Pick an account above to see its own rating.

HunnyBunBun
Approved$11.11/hr
Fast ApprovalFair Attention ChecksUnderpays

I was weary at first, but they turned out to be legit. They need to work on their format. Completely overhaul it. Everything I experienced was thumbnail size, and the only other option is to Max Screen. The text is TEENY WEENIE! Even on 175% zoom, it doesn't make a difference 😶 Most of the time spent on the tasks is adjusting to see what the hell they need cuz everything is sooo miniature. It's just a lot of work, and the format doesn't flow. Some things are large but rarely. But I trust them now. They just need some polishing up. Very honest, and gives immediate feedback as well.

SlammerGaming0
Image-to-Video-Audio Generation Quality Evaluation
Approved$12.00/hr
Fast ApprovalClear Instructions

It suprised me at first and thought that it'd be hard or unfair, but this study turned out to be legit and fun with an auto-approval from the researcher.

Goose7678
Image Diversity Ranking
Approved
Fast ApprovalUnderpaysConfusing Instructions

The tasks are usually not particularly short, but the payment does not feel fair relative to the time required (underpaid), depending on the type of AI study. In most cases, the researcher submits the study immediately after completion. Although the study page warns that there may be NSFW videos or images, I did not find this to be the case. Instead, the content felt more like “Dreamcore” or “Weirdcore,” or subtly unsettling material, especially when required to repeatedly view and rate similar content for 15–25 minutes. It did not affect me personally, but others who may be sensitive to this should take it into consideration.

Trichinella
Approved

The pay per hour is rather low and the time allocated for the task requested is not enough to make a good job, but overall it was easy and they paid immediately. The time thing is a bit of a problem, though.

neonstarlight
Text-to-Image Quality Evaluation
Approved
Underpays

Took longer than stated and almost timed-out. Underpaying as well.

User
Your experience with the Codex AI coding tool (8-minute survey)
Approved$20.76/hr
Fast ApprovalClear Instructions

Decent study with a good pay

Kitt
Text-to-Image Quality Evaluation
Approved$6.86/hr
Fast ApprovalUnderpays

At first I didn't take this study because pay was too low. Then it popped back up and said it took about 9 minutes instead of the intended 16 minutes, paying $19.63 USD an hour, so I grabbed it. I did my best to complete the comparisions as it wanted me to, but this took me almost 30 minutes, and I got a warning that I needed to hurry up and finish to not get flagged as taking too long. I don't know how a person can give quality answers to 45 comparisons AND read the introduction/instructions in 9 or even 16 minutes. Instant approval.