The study is overall good, but the prompts to read are so tedious that I returned one of them and lazily completed another one while still passing checks cuz I know all checks by heart atp.
AI Researcher - Prolific Researcher Reviews
4 Prolific accounts share this name
¿Eres este investigador? Cómo tratamos tus datos y cómo oponerte.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
- AI Ground Truth on Hate and Discrimination
- AI Ground Truth on Privacy, Doxxing, Deanonymization
- AI Ground Truth on Emotional Substitution
- AI Ground Truth on System Integrity and Jailbreaks
- AI Ground Truth on Specialized Advice
- AI Ground Truth on Suicide and Self-Harm
Escribe una reseña
Necesitas una cuenta para compartir tu experiencia con este investigador.
29 Reseñas
A blended rating across every account grouped under this page - not one person. Pick an account above to see its own rating.
They pay what they promise to and the study isn't that bad if you have no problems with subjecting yourself to 15-minute long brain frying. Just do the study in one go without taking any breaks or it will count your response time as irregular and reject the study. The approval is instant.
Aside from the pay dropping, the recent studies have been incredibly buggy. Sometimes I would complete a few evaluations, only for the study to stop working suddenly. I would be cautious with these, especially when receiving a large batch.
You can still submit it with NOCODE and show proof of error screenshots during the test. The 2nd week of September 2026 was a massacre for this researcher's studies, and I was able to complete 3/4 of the tasks due to the study not being able to parse additional tasks. SS-ed using the online snippet app and shared the link to them. Got paid the following day or the day after tomorrow. Just be make sure the link and image are proper.
pay have gone down recently :( but instant pay so 3 star
Used to be better, pay has gone down a lot, and the 'obvious test cases' aren't accurate anymore, you'll get flagged even if you select all the right ones. 3 stars for instant approvals and still easy to do.
Wasted 20 minutes only for their automatic systems flag me and tell me I "Failed to correctly choose obvious test cases." Don't bother.
You still get paid, though. Just put NOCODE and use online snipping tools to screenshot and send the link to them when reporting an error at the endi of the study. I got this like once or twice on different occasions. The 2nd week of September 2026 was a massacre for studies from this current researcher, tho. Constant errors.
Instant approval and not really hard to do, but since some weeks, the "attention check" are totally off. Before, I didn't fail them, now, according to them, I always fail them while the supposed ones seem quite obvious. It doesn't have an impact, but it's still very strange. And yes, they underpay
Extremely buggy study. Doesn't give you required options, etc.
404 error at the end of study, no code. Spent 20 minutes for nothing. Thank you very much!
Usually complete this with no problems but after I finished all 35 tasks it glitched out and I had to submit with no code. Wasted my time and I don't want to risk a rejection so I returned it.
They won't reject if you put NOCODE and show proof with a screenshot. Use an online snippet tool and share the link to them. But always make sure the link and image are properly shown by testing it first.
I am redoing my review for this study because the researcher has changed a lot compared to the last time I worked for them. Nowadays, their studies actually respect the intended time to complete and pay more fairly than before. And they still approve these kinds of tasks very quickly.
I really enjoy doing these studys, they are simple and easy to do, with fair attention checks, I have always manged to complete in just under the estimated time, always instant approval.
It was an automatic approval. I think they should add a “None of these choices” option, since many of the options were questionable.
took about the right time and instant approvals
About what was estimated in terms of speed. Pretty standard image to video quality evaluation.
Very simply study, fast approval.
Study was marked as a 40 minutes completion time. It took 1 and a half hour to complete it and almost running out of time. They always mark studies with lower completion time than the real expected time to complete. It's totally underpaid, you can't review 42 videos with two descriptions for each one in 40 minutes, its impossible.
Joined, asked me to return because all the studies have been completed.
The study took much longer than estimated; I had about 5 minutes left on the timer and felt pressed for time for most of the batch. For the amount of work that's asked, I think the pay could be higher. The only positive is that approval is instant.
opening study link leads to 404 not found