4 Prolific accounts share this name
Sind Sie dieser Forscher? So gehen wir mit Ihren Daten um und so können Sie widersprechen.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Du brauchst ein Konto, um deine Erfahrung mit diesem Forscher zu teilen.
A blended rating across every account grouped under this page - not one person. Pick an account above to see its own rating.
The study is overall good, but the prompts to read are so tedious that I returned one of them and lazily completed another one while still passing checks cuz I know all checks by heart atp.
They pay what they promise to and the study isn't that bad if you have no problems with subjecting yourself to 15-minute long brain frying. Just do the study in one go without taking any breaks or it will count your response time as irregular and reject the study. The approval is instant.
Aside from the pay dropping, the recent studies have been incredibly buggy. Sometimes I would complete a few evaluations, only for the study to stop working suddenly. I would be cautious with these, especially when receiving a large batch.
You can still submit it with NOCODE and show proof of error screenshots during the test. The 2nd week of September 2026 was a massacre for this researcher's studies, and I was able to complete 3/4 of the tasks due to the study not being able to parse additional tasks. SS-ed using the online snippet app and shared the link to them. Got paid the following day or the day after tomorrow. Just be make sure the link and image are proper.
pay have gone down recently :( but instant pay so 3 star
Used to be better, pay has gone down a lot, and the 'obvious test cases' aren't accurate anymore, you'll get flagged even if you select all the right ones. 3 stars for instant approvals and still easy to do.
Wasted 20 minutes only for their automatic systems flag me and tell me I "Failed to correctly choose obvious test cases." Don't bother.
You still get paid, though. Just put NOCODE and use online snipping tools to screenshot and send the link to them when reporting an error at the endi of the study. I got this like once or twice on different occasions. The 2nd week of September 2026 was a massacre for studies from this current researcher, tho. Constant errors.
Instant approval and not really hard to do, but since some weeks, the "attention check" are totally off. Before, I didn't fail them, now, according to them, I always fail them while the supposed ones seem quite obvious. It doesn't have an impact, but it's still very strange. And yes, they underpay
Extremely buggy study. Doesn't give you required options, etc.
404 error at the end of study, no code. Spent 20 minutes for nothing. Thank you very much!
Usually complete this with no problems but after I finished all 35 tasks it glitched out and I had to submit with no code. Wasted my time and I don't want to risk a rejection so I returned it.
They won't reject if you put NOCODE and show proof with a screenshot. Use an online snippet tool and share the link to them. But always make sure the link and image are properly shown by testing it first.
I am redoing my review for this study because the researcher has changed a lot compared to the last time I worked for them. Nowadays, their studies actually respect the intended time to complete and pay more fairly than before. And they still approve these kinds of tasks very quickly.
I really enjoy doing these studys, they are simple and easy to do, with fair attention checks, I have always manged to complete in just under the estimated time, always instant approval.
It was an automatic approval. I think they should add a “None of these choices” option, since many of the options were questionable.
took about the right time and instant approvals
About what was estimated in terms of speed. Pretty standard image to video quality evaluation.
Very simply study, fast approval.
Study was marked as a 40 minutes completion time. It took 1 and a half hour to complete it and almost running out of time. They always mark studies with lower completion time than the real expected time to complete. It's totally underpaid, you can't review 42 videos with two descriptions for each one in 40 minutes, its impossible.
Joined, asked me to return because all the studies have been completed.
The study took much longer than estimated; I had about 5 minutes left on the timer and felt pressed for time for most of the batch. For the amount of work that's asked, I think the pay could be higher. The only positive is that approval is instant.
opening study link leads to 404 not found
After clicking through from first page I was told that there were already enough submissions and I was asked to return the study. This was after trying to take a similar study by the same researcher 30 minutes earlier called 'AI Ground Truth on Emotional Substitution' where I got a 404 page error as soon as I clicked to take the study. I now know this researcher also goes by the name 'AI safety researcher' who has been rated on this platform (very poorly). Would avoid.
Survey took a long time to load, claimed to be authenticating with Prolific. When it finally loaded there were no tasks and it had to be returned. Time waster.
Super easy to do and paid out instantly
I honestly don't know how people are completing these in under the time estimated. I took 31 minutes when it was supposed to take 23, and I rushed through most of it! The pay could be better too for how long it took me. The study instantly approved though, that's the one positive thing I can say about it.
A lot of prompts for the time provided but approved after 1 day.
I was weary at first, but they turned out to be legit. They need to work on their format. Completely overhaul it. Everything I experienced was thumbnail size, and the only other option is to Max Screen. The text is TEENY WEENIE! Even on 175% zoom, it doesn't make a difference 😶 Most of the time spent on the tasks is adjusting to see what the hell they need cuz everything is sooo miniature. It's just a lot of work, and the format doesn't flow. Some things are large but rarely. But I trust them now. They just need some polishing up. Very honest, and gives immediate feedback as well.
The tasks are usually not particularly short, but the payment does not feel fair relative to the time required (underpaid), depending on the type of AI study. In most cases, the researcher submits the study immediately after completion. Although the study page warns that there may be NSFW videos or images, I did not find this to be the case. Instead, the content felt more like “Dreamcore” or “Weirdcore,” or subtly unsettling material, especially when required to repeatedly view and rate similar content for 15–25 minutes. It did not affect me personally, but others who may be sensitive to this should take it into consideration.
Decent study with a good pay
At first I didn't take this study because pay was too low. Then it popped back up and said it took about 9 minutes instead of the intended 16 minutes, paying $19.63 USD an hour, so I grabbed it. I did my best to complete the comparisions as it wanted me to, but this took me almost 30 minutes, and I got a warning that I needed to hurry up and finish to not get flagged as taking too long. I don't know how a person can give quality answers to 45 comparisons AND read the introduction/instructions in 9 or even 16 minutes. Instant approval.