FD HQ - Prolific Researcher Reviews

4 Prolific accounts share this name

Você é este pesquisador? Veja como tratamos seus dados e como se opor.

Combined across 4 accounts
16 avaliações6 rejeições706 views
Insights
$8.93/hrMedian hourly pay4 data points
45%Approval rate11 data points
1h 15mMedian actual time4 data points
Reported feedback
Technical issues2Slow approval1Underpays1

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific20
  • Cultural responses to fragrance campaigns
  • Exploring opportunities in absorbent underwear
  • Fragrance shopper experience in travel retail
  • In-store Signage and Category Education
  • Your Apprenticeship Journey
  • Snack perceptions research

Escrever uma Revisão

Você precisa de uma conta para compartilhar sua experiência com este pesquisador.

16 Revisões

Accounts behind this page
Combined across 4 accounts

A blended rating across every account grouped under this page - not one person. Pick an account above to see its own rating.

Skyflow
Społeczne postrzeganie przystępności cenowej energii
Rejected£6.33/hr
Slow ApprovalUnderpaysTechnical Issues

scammers, rejected my submissions for low effort, when it took literaly1,5x longer than anticipated

User
Olympics Engagement and Relevance Research - 30+
Approved£8.94/hr

Hello, It took a bit of time. I submitted it on September 13th, and it was approved on September 24th. Cheers

User·

Don't do these studies from the researcher because it rejected mine if you do continuously do his study sometime in life it reject your study.

User
Rejected

Do not engage. Absolute scammers. The Study took way longer than they claimed then rejected for failing to meet quality standards.

User
Olympics engagement and relevance research -gen z
Rejected

They are thieves they rejected my submission and they said that you don't meet quality standards. So we are not paying you

User
Public Perceptions of Platform Safety Announcements
Rejected

These scammers claimed that my work, for over 40 minutes, was “low effort.” I have submitted hundreds of studies to Prolific without a single rejection. If I do a study, I give it my full attention. I was always compensated until these data thieves came along. I have filed a formal complaint with Prolific. Also, I will be filing GDPR and CCPA complaints as well. Do not waste your time with these sociopaths.

User
an

At this point, I think the chances Prolific doesn't know it's trafficking user data to FocalData free of charge (except, of course, for the fee paid directly to Prolific) are close to 0.

User
Soda and wellness attitudes
Screened Out

screened out after choosing my gender. researcher should learn to use prolific's filters, but it sounds like i dodged a bullet here anyway

Christopher P
Returned
Technical Issues

Absolutely terrible chatbot. l

Algernon
Exploratory study on hope
Rejected

If you see FocalData on any survey, not just from FD HQ, then do not engage. You will spend an hour dealing with a buggy AI chatbot, and then they will reject your thoughtful responses for “intentional low-effort” to save a buck.

Luminicae
Assessing influencer content for partnerships
Returned

Study got "returned" automatically, I was very surprised. I did finish it but researcher is not acting fair though .. another time I got screened-out in the middle of the interview, even I tried to give 1-2 sentences per answer but the AI bot is always asking the same questions, it's actually very tiring to complete the whole interview. Also the bot questions were not loading properly, just buffering OR if u typed something you couldn't hit "enter" button and needed to refresh the page with F5 in order to continue (it worked eventually). This whole page is very buggy ... can't recommend this.

patriiiiick
Public Perceptions of Community Led Infrastructure
Returned

items are not loading properly, not recommended ......

User
Public Perceptions of Community Led Infrastructure

AI chatbot doesn't load properly when you answer the questions so you'll have to type in your answer twice. Waste of time.

donavgeorge2012
Approved

heard a lot of negative about them but my Ai interview finished on time and got paid

JakeJDB
First Jobs and Career Progression
Approved

It was quite repetitive however i did respond to the ai with the best of my ability always giving 1-2 sentences. It does say in the description dont give 1 word answers otherwise they will reject which can seem a bit harsh as some of the questions can be answered with 1 word. I recieved my payment a couple hours after completing.

Loo
Rejected

Avoid, avoid, avoid! I spent nearly an hour doing a survey for them, and it was rejected for being “poor quality”. The survey was facilitated through an awkward chat bot, with several questions that did not make sense. Even so, I asked the chat bot to clarify what it meant, to rephrase questions or to elaborate. I did my very best to answer the questions. I provided thoughtful answers to all questions. After 3 days of waiting for approval, I was rejected. The researcher did not provide any explanation as to what about my submission was poor quality, even though I wrote them twice asking for clarification. Do not waste your time doing surveys for this researcher.

Andy
Screened Out

Researcher screens you out after you spent 20 minutes on the survey. Highly sketchy. Avoid.