Skyflow
1.0
Społeczne postrzeganie przystępności cenowej energiiRejected£6.33/hr
Slow ApprovalUnderpaysTechnical Issues
scammers, rejected my submissions for low effort, when it took literaly1,5x longer than anticipated
FD HQ - Prolific Researcher Reviews
4 Prolific accounts share this name
Are you this researcher? Read how we handle your data and how to object.
1.8
Combined across 4 accounts16 reviews6 rejections705 views
Insights
$8.93/hrMedian hourly pay4 data points
45%Approval rate11 data points
1h 15mMedian actual time4 data points
Reported feedback
Technical issues2Slow approval1Underpays1
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Studies seen on Prolific20
- Cultural responses to fragrance campaigns
- Exploring opportunities in absorbent underwear
- Fragrance shopper experience in travel retail
- In-store Signage and Category Education
- Your Apprenticeship Journey
- Snack perceptions research
Write a Review
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
16 Reviews
Accounts behind this page
1.8
Combined across 4 accountsA blended rating across every account grouped under this page - not one person. Pick an account above to see its own rating.
User
5.0
Olympics Engagement and Relevance Research - 30+Approved£8.94/hr
Hello, It took a bit of time. I submitted it on September 13th, and it was approved on September 24th. Cheers
User·
Don't do these studies from the researcher because it rejected mine if you do continuously do his study sometime in life it reject your study.
User
1.0
Rejected
Do not engage. Absolute scammers. The Study took way longer than they claimed then rejected for failing to meet quality standards.
User
1.0
Olympics engagement and relevance research -gen zRejected
They are thieves they rejected my submission and they said that you don't meet quality standards. So we are not paying you
User
1.0
Public Perceptions of Platform Safety AnnouncementsRejected
These scammers claimed that my work, for over 40 minutes, was “low effort.” I have submitted hundreds of studies to Prolific without a single rejection. If I do a study, I give it my full attention. I was always compensated until these data thieves came along. I have filed a formal complaint with Prolific. Also, I will be filing GDPR and CCPA complaints as well. Do not waste your time with these sociopaths.
User
1.0
anAt this point, I think the chances Prolific doesn't know it's trafficking user data to FocalData free of charge (except, of course, for the fee paid directly to Prolific) are close to 0.
User
1.0
Soda and wellness attitudesScreened Out
screened out after choosing my gender. researcher should learn to use prolific's filters, but it sounds like i dodged a bullet here anyway
Christopher P
1.0
Returned
Technical Issues
Absolutely terrible chatbot. l
Algernon
1.0
Exploratory study on hopeRejected
If you see FocalData on any survey, not just from FD HQ, then do not engage. You will spend an hour dealing with a buggy AI chatbot, and then they will reject your thoughtful responses for “intentional low-effort” to save a buck.
Luminicae
1.0
Assessing influencer content for partnershipsReturned
Study got "returned" automatically, I was very surprised. I did finish it but researcher is not acting fair though .. another time I got screened-out in the middle of the interview, even I tried to give 1-2 sentences per answer but the AI bot is always asking the same questions, it's actually very tiring to complete the whole interview. Also the bot questions were not loading properly, just buffering OR if u typed something you couldn't hit "enter" button and needed to refresh the page with F5 in order to continue (it worked eventually). This whole page is very buggy ... can't recommend this.