I spent 9 minutes on this 20-minute study and was screened out without a code: Unfortunately, you do not qualify for this study. We would like to thank you for your interest and time. Thus, I was forced to either file a NOCODE or return the study. I finished with a NOCODE and messaged the researcher about it. There was no indication of why I was screened out, but it might have been because I told them of a technical issue with their AI chatbot (AD blockers will block it). One more thing: for a study filled with attention check questions and exercises, they could do a much better job of not wasting someone's time with all of that stuff before they get to the screening.
Crowd Power - Prolific Researcher Reviews
ID: 63c06aa373f5b0970d21325f
Are you this researcher? Read how we handle your data and how to object.
3.7
3 reviews95 views
Insights
100%Approval rate2 data points
Reported feedback
Underpays1In-study screening1Technical issues1Unfair attention checks1
Studies seen on Prolific2
- Short study for research
- Study on political opinions and attitudes
Write a Review
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
3 Reviews
Revo
1.0
Study on political opinions and attitudesScreened Out
UnderpaysIn Study ScreeningTechnical IssuesUnfair Attention Checks
Dude6967369
5.0
Short study for researchApproved
Fair Pay, actually kind of fun. Note my payout was 2 not .67
malleabletortoise
5.0
Short study for researchApproved
Approved immediately upon submission. MIT & gov't study.