The study took much less than the intended time, thankfully, because it started out at the minimum pay per hour. It ended up taking me about 54 minutes as opposed to the intended 90. Some of the parts the instructions did kind of confuse me. I liked the different tasks so that it didn't get too monotonous.
mq.edu.au - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 9 researchers
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 9 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
- Loudness Perception of Audiovisual Speech in Noise
- Reactions to DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion)
- Consumer survey Copy
- Perceptions of Exonerees
- AI tour guide study
- Coping with financial setbacks
Eine Überprüfung schreiben
Du brauchst ein Konto, um deine Erfahrung mit diesem Forscher zu teilen.
6 Überprüfungen
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
Study took over twice as long as the intended completion time.
Uses memory recall checks which are not allowed by Prolific policy.
Unfairly screened out after a long consent form with comprehension questions; no payment.
A comprehension test for the consent form was unusual (at least answers were all in the text above so it was not a memory test) and there were warnings that submissions would be rejected for failing attention checks and/or finishing task too quickly. No problems completing the survey, which consisted mainly of likert scale responses. Fair pay for time and effort required. Approved very quickly after submitting.
Utilizes memory recall attention checks, which are not allowed on Prolific. Avoid.