Uses memory recall checks which are not allowed by Prolific policy.
mq.edu.au - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 9 researchers
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 9 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
- Loudness Perception of Audiovisual Speech in Noise
- Reactions to DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion)
- Consumer survey Copy
- Perceptions of Exonerees
- AI tour guide study
- Coping with financial setbacks
Write a Review
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
4 Reviews
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
Unfairly screened out after a long consent form with comprehension questions; no payment.
A comprehension test for the consent form was unusual (at least answers were all in the text above so it was not a memory test) and there were warnings that submissions would be rejected for failing attention checks and/or finishing task too quickly. No problems completing the survey, which consisted mainly of likert scale responses. Fair pay for time and effort required. Approved very quickly after submitting.
Utilizes memory recall attention checks, which are not allowed on Prolific. Avoid.