Prolific Tea has no investors. It runs on donations from participants like you. Chip in

nus.edu.sg - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 19 researchers

Institution-wide rating
9 reviews1 rejection208 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 19 researchers at this institution.

Insights
$10.87/hrMedian hourly pay40 data points
98%Approval rate41 data points
4 minMedian actual time40 data points
Reported feedback
Confusing instructions1

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific20
  • Human Relationships
  • Public Judgments about National Policy Choices
  • Beliefs and Preferences
  • Information Evaluation
  • Judging Workplace Incidents
  • Attitudes and Beliefs of Roe v. Wade

Write a Review

You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.

9 Reviews

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

JakeJDB
perceptions and opinions
Approved£8.00/hr

easy study with fast approval

Tfw7
perceptions and opinions
Approved£11.40/hr

quick easy

grilethredc
Information Evaluation
Approved£1.72/hr

This took way longer than the time stated. I almost timed out

Tfw7
Beliefs and Preferences
Approved£15.00/hr

actually 55p short and easy to do, but the questions are very leading!

MessengerPijon
Attitudes and Beliefs of Roe v Wade
Approved£6.55/hr
Confusing Instructions

Estimated completion time was 6 mins and I took nearly double that time, I think it still paid well enough though, but the listed time is pretty far off :\ did also contain a few written portions, and one of the questions was a bit confusing bc it was asking any smth I never saw.

Matt Smith
Avatar Perception
Approved

This was a very unusual study that required providing detailed opinions on the topic for over 45 minutes, and it was easy for it to take even longer. The survey inconsistently switched between auto-advancing and requiring manual progression, which made it difficult to stay alert. The attention checks were especially easy to miss because they were hidden within the introductory text. Once you got into a rhythm of answering the open-ended questions, it was very easy to overlook one. In my opinion, the study wasn't worth the time or the risk of rejection. It felt like the researcher was using misleading attention checks to collect as much free data as possible. I accepted two of these studies but returned one out of caution. I'd recommend avoiding this researcher and blocking them, as the potential payout doesn't justify the time or the risk.

Mikasa
Music Study
Approved£4.67/hr

Quick approval. There is one part slightly confusing but happy to have it approved soon after completion

Kas
A Survey about Advertise

Falsely claimed i failed an attention check when i did not. It was only a 3 minute study so i returned it to avoid a rejection.

HollieJo10
Avatar Perception
Rejected£6.87/hr

Very odd studies, requires you to give your opinion on the subject matter over 45 minutes (which it goes over very easily). Very long study and seems to move between auto-advancing you or letting you advance yourself to the next question. The attention checks are super easy to miss because you can easily get in a flow describing what you feel and miss them slipping one in the description up top. In my opinion, this is a dishonest, sneaky researcher looking for free data and just is not worth the time or possible rejections if you get rolling. I did twp of these and I returned the other one out of caution. Avoid and block, just not worth it.

HollieJo10·

The researcher allowed me to return after I asked but did not reply I just noticed the option available.