O Prolific Tea não tem investidores. Ele funciona com doações de participantes como você. Apoiar agora
Institution · 5 researchers
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 5 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Você precisa de uma conta para compartilhar sua experiência com este pesquisador.
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
rejected for going too quickly. It was a very easy-to-read set of questions. I have messaged the researcher and opened a ticket with Prolific. UPDATE: heard nothing from researcher, but my appeal to Prolific was successful, and they have overturned my rejection. Fortunately I had video evidence as I screen recorded.
This study is poorly setup. They give you this large block of instructions to read and by the time you complete reading it you notice that you only have 2 minutes to complete the task.. half of which was taken up by reading... Once you finally complete the survey there is no completion code. Avoid.
I deleted my previous review because they've since approved me. I was auto-rejected by Prolific for speeding because I took 10 minutes to complete this study, and the average time was 14 minutes. I submitted an appeal to Prolific and messaged the researcher. Thankfully it was approved. I docked a star for the stress/inconvenience, but I'm glad the rejection was reversed.
I've jsut been rejected from one for the same reason
Fun creative activity. No completion code provided, so I entered NOCODE, and sent the researcher a polite message. Study approved 4.5hrs later. 1st time doing this researchers study.
A study on creativity! Asks to write as many creative ideas for a subject as you can. I believe I was given a soft warning about the validity of my answers, so I re-wrote them and I was able to proceed to part two and answer another question. I docked a star due to the soft warning as I just don't feel it was explained well/clear enough. It could have been part of the project but it struck me as odd.