This study is poorly setup. They give you this large block of instructions to read and by the time you complete reading it you notice that you only have 2 minutes to complete the task.. half of which was taken up by reading... Once you finally complete the survey there is no completion code. Avoid.
uwr.edu.pl - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 5 researchers
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 5 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
- Creativity and Virtual Tours
- Reading Experiences Study (CP1)
- Cz_picture selection
- Art perception - quality assessment of artworks
- Picture selection task - RUS
- Creativity
Write a Review
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
4 Reviews
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
I deleted my previous review because they've since approved me. I was auto-rejected by Prolific for speeding because I took 10 minutes to complete this study, and the average time was 14 minutes. I submitted an appeal to Prolific and messaged the researcher. Thankfully it was approved. I docked a star for the stress/inconvenience, but I'm glad the rejection was reversed.
Fun creative activity. No completion code provided, so I entered NOCODE, and sent the researcher a polite message. Study approved 4.5hrs later. 1st time doing this researchers study.
A study on creativity! Asks to write as many creative ideas for a subject as you can. I believe I was given a soft warning about the validity of my answers, so I re-wrote them and I was able to proceed to part two and answer another question. I docked a star due to the soft warning as I just don't feel it was explained well/clear enough. It could have been part of the project but it struck me as odd.