Institution · 28 researchers
Are you this researcher? Read how we handle your data and how to object.
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 28 researchers at this institution.
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
The researcher expected us to read 30 scenarios, each about a paragraph long, then read two separate choices for each scenario, which were also about a paragraph each, and choose between scenario A or B. So we were expected to read 90 paragraphs total and deliberate over which choice we would make in each scenario, all within twenty minutes. It's completely ridiculous to expect that all this can be done in twenty minutes.
Took me less time than intended to complete, and paid pretty well. Approved within minutes
Had memory tests at the end, though I'm unsure if these were quality checks or not. Waiting on review
Too involved for such low payment, all writing.
This study requires you to use specific words in sentences that show your understanding of what those words means. While it is an interesting study I don't believe the researcher is providing an appropriate reward. It collects demographic information as well as requires writing. This should be .75-1.00.
Quick political survey with clear instructions and paid well for the time required.