Weirdly enough I actually didn't have any issues with the attention checks or anything. It asked me to count to 10 at the start and then click next, and also had me draw a smiley face at the end (I assume that was also an attention thing?), but they seemed to work fine. The study was simple, took me slightly less time than intended, paid quite well, and approved immediately. I suppose I'll have to be wary of them in the future though in case I just got lucky.
- Prolific Researcher Reviews
ID: 5f071ae320ae1007979bde3f
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
- Take a brief survey for research!
- Attitudes and Judgments
Eine Überprüfung schreiben
Du brauchst ein Konto, um deine Erfahrung mit diesem Forscher zu teilen.
4 Überprüfungen
Broken attention check question like the other reviews mentioned.
So at first it had you read a little prompt then asked which town they were talking about, I hit the CORRECT town. Went to the next page and it asked what picture is in this ( bunch of computer symbols) it was quite obvious it was a cherry, picked cherry then on the next page it told me I failed one of them then continued to a page where it wanted me to count. So I noped out of there real quick and cancelled before she could reject me. Don't do Hannah Kim studies, she clearly doesn't know her own attention checks and like rejecting.
Put out a study with a bizarre attention check that required you to count for a certain amount of time. After doing exactly what the instructions told me to do, it claimed I failed their test. Cancelled and immediately blocked this researcher after that.