Tfw7
1.0
a study about service robotsReturned
had to return as I couldn't answer one of the questions as there were no suitable options
xmu.edu.cn - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 4 researchers
2.0
Institution-wide rating4 révisions2 rejets179 views
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 4 researchers at this institution.
Insights
$12.97/hrMedian hourly pay7 data points
78%Approval rate9 data points
3 minMedian actual time7 data points
Reported feedback
Underpays1No communication1Fast approval1Fair attention checks1
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Titres d'étude partagés détectés
Des études de ce chercheur apparaissent également sous 2 autres chercheurs avec de mauvaises évaluations.
Studies seen on Prolific4
- Consumer Survey
- Language Complexity and Science Crowdfunding Performance
- A study about a hypothetical hotel experience
- brand survey
Écrire un avis
Vous avez besoin d'un compte pour partager votre expérience avec ce chercheur.
4 Avis
Researchers at this institution
2.0
Institution-wideA blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
jackjt8
5.0
Consumer SurveyApproved£10.50/hr
Fast ApprovalFair Attention Checks
I'm going to take a risk on this study. It's short and very easy. Asking about restaurant wait times. Approval wasn't instant.. but was fast.
Stackflow
1.0
Prolific B- Invitation to Share Your Valuable Opinions_02 - CopyRejected
UnderpaysNo Communication
They rejected me for selecting "strongly agree" in a survey where there were no right or wrong answers. This researcher rejected not only me but many other people as well for a similar reason. (stu.xmu.edu.cn)
FairOwl18
1.0
Rejected
Stu.xmu.edu.cn