ProlificTea

Prolific Tea has no investors. It runs on donations from participants like you. Chip in

uu.nl - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 19 researchers

Institution-wide rating
4 reviews1 rejection131 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 19 researchers at this institution.

Insights
$7.10/hrMedian hourly pay13 data points
94%Approval rate16 data points
17 minMedian actual time13 data points
Reported feedback
Unfair attention checks1In-study screening1

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific20
  • Intentionality perception IV
  • Social attitudes in social media
  • Negative outcomes in decision-making
  • Opinions on recent news articles
  • Decision Making with Visualization
  • Evaluating the accuracy of GenAI results

Write a Review

You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.

Sign inCreate account

4 Reviews

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

Luminicae
Rejected

very fkn rude. I got screened out after 18 mins in study and they said "finished the study too quickly". bs. After I asked very friendly why in particular I got screened out and that I adjusted the credit card size etc. to fulfill all screen requirements, they replied very rude instead of giving a proper reply. I got rejected now which has a negative impact on my whole study participation statistics, I hope to make it reverse .. contacted Prolific about this. (It was another researcher with ID 65c34a0b7f3e679d0749af3c but I couldn't select it here).

Daros
Negative outcomes in decision-making
Asked to Return

The study was broken. It asked me to listen to several sounds, some of them quite disturbing, including someone screaming, and then report how many times I heard a beep. I even turned my computer's volume up to the maximum, but there were no beep sounds at all. Since I couldn't correctly report the number of beeps, I was told to return the study, even after I had already spent nearly 15 minutes on it. That's completely unfair and unethical.

JakeJDB
Experiences and views of the police
Approved

very interesting study and paid out quickly

SlammerGaming0
Evaluating startup vacancies v5
Asked to Return
Unfair Attention ChecksIn Study Screening

Most unfair screeners I've ever seen. Just because my prescreening slightly didn't match their screener questions, they screened me out and forced me to return. Happened twice to me, and now I'm blacklisted. What a scam.