user
5.0
Overall fairness judgments of public arrangements (III)Approved£12.71/hr
Fast ApprovalClear Instructions
Cognitively demanding study. Good rate and fast approval.
sdu.edu.cn - Prolific Researcher Reviews
Institution · 3 researchers
3.7
3 reviews1 rejection92 views
Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 3 researchers at this institution.
Insights
$18.24/hrMedian hourly pay9 data points
90%Approval rate10 data points
5 minMedian actual time9 data points
Reported feedback
Fast approval2Clear instructions2No communication1Confusing instructions1Fair attention checks1
Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.
Studies seen on Prolific9
- Short bonus-allocation recipient task
- Overall fairness judgments of public arrangements (III)
- A simple survey of food evaluation
- Questionnaire on Visiting Experience in the Botanical Garden and Environmental Protect
- CONSUMER ATTITUDES SURVEY
- A easy consumer survey
Write a Review
You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.
3 Reviews
Researchers at this institution
3.7
A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.
Stackflow
5.0
Overall fairness judgments of public arrangements (III)Approved£13.56/hr
Fast ApprovalClear InstructionsFair Attention Checks
I am literally surprised, as this study was from China, except that nothing was common between other studies from China and this one. Simple interesting decision making study pay rate was quite good and approved just within 2 hours, which is also quite surprising. Since this was only the second study of the day, I initially considered not trying it because we are aware of the reputation of Chinese researchers. However, I took a chance and got approved in two hours, and now i can freely breath.
the broke one
1.0
Serve as Mock Juror on a Criminal CaseRejected
No CommunicationConfusing Instructions
this SUCKER had a survey on mock jury trials, and when I opened the study, the first question they asked was "Have you ever protested for abortion" in which I said yes, and was immediately screened out. Not only that, they rejected the study, OVER A SINGLE QUESTION THAT THEY SCREENED ME OUT OF. Stay away from them, as they have an automatic rejection over the silliest bs and rejections will reject your account. Most researchers don't know how much it affects your account or don't CARE. If a survey study says "you have been screened out" it should show as "screened out" and not "rejected" over a single. stupid. question that had NOTHING to do with mock jury trials. AN ABORTION QUESTION? SERIOUSLY? Thx for the reject, scumbags!