ProlificTea

northumbria.ac.uk - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 4 researchers

Institution-wide rating
1 review1 rejection49 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 4 researchers at this institution.

Insights
$8.62/hrMedian hourly pay4 data points
75%Approval rate4 data points
7 minMedian actual time4 data points

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific5
  • How travel influencers impact travellers' trust and booking intentions for five-star... Copy Copy
  • How travel influencers impact travellers' trust and booking intentions for five-star... Copy
  • Artificial Intelligence Without Operators
  • An examination of factors that impact jury decision-making.
  • Understanding How Individual Differences Predict Attitudes Toward Gambling Harm

Write a Review

You need an account to share your experience with this researcher.

Sign inCreate account

1 Review

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

Kop327
How travel influencers impact travellers' trust and booking intentions for five-star resorts in the Maldives.
Rejected£7.65/hr

(Note: the study only showed "By northumbria.ac.uk," so I couldn't identify which specific researcher ran it.) Rejected with the reason "finished too quickly," but I was simply ineligible. The study required having stayed at, researched, or considered a five-star resort in the Maldives, which I hadn't, so I was ended early in the survey. Naturally that's quick. The problem: this study did NOT have the "in-study screening" tag, so my eligibility-based early exit was processed as a rejection instead of a screen-out. Per Prolific's policy, a proper screen-out should be rewarded and not affect your account. This looks like a setup issue on the researcher's side, and it unfairly hurts participants' approval rates. Would advise caution — if you don't meet the criteria and there's no screening tag, return & report rather than submit.