Prolific Tea no tiene inversores. Funciona con donaciones de participantes como tú. Aportar ahora

gsu.edu - Prolific Researcher Reviews

Institution · 6 researchers

Institution-wide rating
1 reseña1 rechazo118 views

Institution-wide insights - pooled across all 6 researchers at this institution.

Insights
$17.08/hrMedian hourly pay2 data points
100%Approval rate2 data points
4 minMedian actual time2 data points

Includes figures observed automatically from real Prolific submissions by the Prolific Tea extension, pooled with on-site reviews.

Studies seen on Prolific6
  • Brand Study
  • Creative product idea evaluation
  • Study 3 service encounter in hotel
  • Pilot Release 2: Group Persuasion Interaction Study with Human and AI Marketing Agents
  • Survey about work experience related to vulnerability
  • Budget Decisions Pre-Survey

Escribe una reseña

Necesitas una cuenta para compartir tu experiencia con este investigador.

1 Reseña

Researchers at this institution
Institution-wide

A blended rating across every researcher grouped under this institution - not one person. Pick a researcher above to see their own rating.

u/Sad_Steak_6813Admin
Study 3 service encounter in hotel
Rejected$10.00/hrGrosería

An attention check after watching a video was recalling the last 4 digits of a phone number. Which goes against prolific's attention check guidelines: Memory Recall: Prolific explicitly states that valid attention checks "cannot rely on memory recall" (such as remembering a phone number from a scenario). Invalid Rejection: If this was intended as a comprehension check, the policy states participants "should never be rejected" but must be asked to return the study instead. They immediately rejected me without asking to return and after filling up the form I could return the study a week later.